Polar A300 vs Polar M400

Which one should you buy?

Polar fitness trackers are some of the best tools for sports lovers because of the unique features that they offer. The A300 polar fitness tracker has been specially designed for sports lovers like athletes as well as those who visit the gym to work out.

The gadget has been styled to perform multiple functions ranging from monitoring the speed as well as calories burned, distance covered and other aspects. The A300 fitness tracker has alot of similarities to the M4O0 tracker used by runners.However these trackers are designed mostly as smartwatches.

Comparison Between These Wearables

Users have different opinions with regards to the features found in these two devices. Both of the wearables have wristbands that users can wear on their wrists. They vary in colours and users can make a pick of what they prefer. These bands ensure that the trackers don't fall out during jogging or workouts. Both the A300 and M400 trackers can withstand unfavorable weather conditions. However, it should be noted that they do not have waterproof features.

The batteries of both trackers are also rechargeable and this makes it easy for users to charge the devices when the power is out. They have durable batteries that can last for days before the power runs out.

The A300 tracker records activities for 26days while the M400 records activities of users for 24hours. Hence the A300 device has an edge over it's counterpart in this domain.

Both the polar A300 and M400 are able to keep track of the amount of calories burned and distance covered by most runners . Both also have sleep monitors which give sleep reports. Users are able to set alarms and the trackers can also record hours of inactivity. Further, they have an IP rating of 3ATM Sweat and splash resistance. It should be noted, however, that these two do not take any records of the pulse or heartbeat of the user. As a result, it is essential for users to attach an external heart rate monitor and to the device. This applies to both trackers.

Most runners will prefer the M400 trackers because of the GPS tracking device that tracks the location of users. The polar M400 tracker also synchronizes with wireless connection via Bluetooth. This gives it an edge over the A300 tracker as athletes complain a lot about the fact that A300 tracker takes the user through the rigor of setting up the system. The installation process, and connection to a computer with a USB cable as well as the hassle of creating an account, synchronization and updates are some of the drawbacks of the A300. Users consider these processes to be time consuming and tedious. On the other hand it is much easier to setup the M400 tracker.

These two trackers are compatible with social features like Android phones, windows phones and IOS devices. Though the two trackers do not connect with Wi-Fi network, they are quite compatible with Bluetooth devices . The trackers also have other remote features like notification and caller ID.

Also, the M400 polar trackers are solid and good for runners because it presents a sporting platform. On the other hand, the A300 polar tracker is excellent for swimmers as they are resistant to water.

It should be noted that the brand of tracker that users prefer, largely depends on them and their taste. Most runners and other sports lovers prefer the A300 tracker as it can be worn and it's features are quite easy to use. It is unique because of its smartphone notifications as well as its effective tracking mechanisms.